The short answer, explained
The maximum net asset value test is one of the ways a taxpayer can satisfy the basic conditions for the small business CGT concessions. Section 152-10 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 lists it as one alternative; another is being a CGT small business entity, which section 152-10(1AA) ties to the small business entity test with a $2 million turnover threshold. The active asset test must also be met, and further conditions apply to shares and trust interests.
Under section 152-15, the test is satisfied if, just before the CGT event, the total of three amounts does not exceed $6,000,000:
Three amounts are added and compared with $6,000,000
The taxpayer
Net value of the taxpayer's own CGT assets.
Connected entities
Net value of the CGT assets of every entity connected with the taxpayer.
Affiliates
Net value of the CGT assets of affiliates and entities connected with them, but only assets used, or held ready for use, in a business carried on by the taxpayer or an entity connected with the taxpayer (s152-20(3)), and not counting anything already counted in step 2.
The test
Pass if the total does not exceed $6,000,000, measured just before the CGT event (s152-15).
This guide works through what the valuation has to establish for each of those amounts. For whether a valuation is needed at all for the concessions, Oliver Group, the Valuo practice for restructures, tax and CGT, explains the question in do I need a valuation for CGT concessions?.
What "net value of the CGT assets" means
Section 152-20(1) defines the net value of an entity's CGT assets as the total of their market values, less:
- the liabilities of the entity that are related to the assets; and
- provisions for annual leave, long service leave, unearned income and tax liabilities.
The result can be positive, negative or nil. Three points follow for the valuation.
Market value, not book value. The Act uses market value. The ATO's guide to market valuation for tax purposes explains that, unless a provision says otherwise, market value takes its ordinary meaning: a price agreed between a willing but not anxious buyer and seller. Land, plant and especially goodwill usually differ from their book amounts. Depreciating assets are CGT assets, so they are included.
Only related liabilities. Section 152-20(1) deducts only liabilities related to the CGT assets counted. A loan used to buy business premises relates to those premises. A bank overdraft that funds working capital is likely to relate to the business assets generally. A liability that relates only to a disregarded asset is not deducted, except a liability related to interests in a connected entity, which section 152-20(2)(a) keeps in.
Not every provision in the balance sheet is deducted. The Act allows only four kinds of provision as deductions (s152-20(1)(b)): annual leave, long service leave, unearned income and tax liabilities. A provision of another kind, such as for possible damages in a pending lawsuit, is not deducted unless it is a liability related to the assets.
Assets that are left out
| Asset | Treatment | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Shares, units or other interests (except debt) in an entity connected with the entity being tested or with its affiliate | Disregarded, but liabilities related to them are included | s152-20(2)(a) |
| For an individual: assets used solely for personal use and enjoyment of the individual or an affiliate | Disregarded, with any liability related to them | s152-20(2)(b)(i) |
| For an individual: the main residence | Disregarded, except a reasonable amount where it was used to produce assessable income and the interest deductibility condition is met to some extent | s152-20(2)(b)(ii) and (2A) |
| For an individual: rights to superannuation and approved deposit fund amounts or assets | Disregarded | s152-20(2)(b)(iii) and (iv) |
| For an individual: a policy of insurance on the life of an individual | Disregarded | s152-20(2)(b)(v) |
| Assets of an affiliate, or of an entity connected with an affiliate, that are not used or held ready for use in a business carried on by the taxpayer or an entity connected with the taxpayer | Disregarded | s152-20(3) |
| Assets used in the business of an entity connected with the taxpayer only because of an affiliate | Disregarded | s152-20(4) |
The personal use exclusion is narrow. It covers only assets used solely for personal use and enjoyment, so an asset with any income-producing use, such as an interest-earning personal bank account, is counted.
Which entities are counted
Connected entities. Under section 328-125, an entity is connected with another if either controls the other, or both are controlled by the same third entity. Control of an entity other than a discretionary trust is generally an entitlement (with affiliates) to at least 40% of income or capital distributions, or for a company at least 40% of voting power. Control of a discretionary trust is tested by whether the trustee acts, or could reasonably be expected to act, in accordance with the entity's wishes, and by distributions of at least 40% in any of the four preceding income years. Control can be indirect, through a chain of entities. Section 328-125(6) allows the Commissioner to determine that an entity with a control percentage of at least 40% but less than 50% does not control another entity in certain circumstances. For these tests, section 152-78 also lets the trustee of a discretionary trust nominate beneficiaries as controllers of the trust in some circumstances.
Affiliates. Under section 328-130, an individual or company is an affiliate if it acts, or could reasonably be expected to act, in accordance with the taxpayer's directions or wishes, or in concert with the taxpayer, in relation to its business affairs. A business relationship alone does not make someone an affiliate. For the small business concessions, section 152-47 can also treat a spouse or a child under 18 as an affiliate in situations involving passively held assets.
Partnerships. Partnerships need separate care in working out what is counted; confirm the treatment with the tax adviser.
Identifying connected entities and affiliates is a tax question to settle before valuation work starts, because it decides which balance sheets the valuer must value.
Worked example: a hypothetical calculation
This example is hypothetical. The people, entities and figures are invented, rounded, and chosen to show the steps. Market values are assumed to be supported by valuations at the time just before the CGT event.
Alex owns 100% of Alpha Pty Ltd, which runs a business. Alex controls Alpha, so Alpha is connected with Alex. Alpha operates from a warehouse owned by Sam, Alex's spouse. For the example, assume Sam is Alex's affiliate under the tests above. Sam also holds a share portfolio that has nothing to do with Alpha's business.
Each card below shows the net value counted for one person or entity. Amounts shown as $0 are assets the Act tells you to disregard, or a provision the Act does not allow as a deduction.
Alex, Alpha and Sam add up to $3,300,000
Alex (taxpayer)
- Home, super and personal car (disregarded)$0
- Investment property+$1,200,000
- Loan over the investment property−$700,000
- Personal bank account (earns interest, so counted)+$50,000
- Shares in Alpha (disregarded, connected entity)$0
- Loan used to buy the Alpha shares (still included)−$200,000
Net value, Alex$350,000
Alpha Pty Ltd (connected)
- Goodwill, not in the accounts+$1,800,000
- Plant, debtors and cash+$950,000
- Bank loan−$350,000
- Leave provisions−$90,000
- Income tax provision−$60,000
- Possible damages provision $40,000 (not one of the four provisions in s152-20(1)(b), so not deducted)$0
Net value, Alpha$2,250,000
Sam (affiliate)
- Warehouse used in Alpha's business+$1,100,000
- Mortgage over the warehouse−$400,000
- Share portfolio not used in the business (disregarded)$0
Net value counted, Sam$700,000
The total of $3,300,000 leaves $2,700,000 of headroom under $6,000,000
- Net value, Alex$350,000
- Net value, Alpha Pty Ltd+$2,250,000
- Net value counted, Sam+$700,000
- Total for the test$3,300,000
Check: Alex: $1,200,000 less $700,000 is $500,000, plus $50,000 is $550,000, less $200,000 is $350,000. Alpha: assets of $1,800,000 + $400,000 plant + $300,000 debtors + $250,000 cash = $2,750,000, less $350,000 + $90,000 + $60,000 = $500,000, gives $2,250,000. Sam: $1,100,000 less $400,000 is $700,000. Total: $350,000 + $2,250,000 + $700,000 = $3,300,000; $6,000,000 less $3,300,000 is $2,700,000.
Why the goodwill figure matters. Suppose a valuation of Alpha's business instead supported goodwill of $4,600,000, $2,800,000 more than assumed above.
With goodwill of $4,600,000 the total is $6,100,000 and the test is failed
- Alex $350,000
- Alpha Pty Ltd, with the higher goodwill $5,050,000
- Sam $700,000
Check: Alpha's net value becomes $2,250,000 + $2,800,000 = $5,050,000, and the total is $350,000 + $5,050,000 + $700,000 = $6,100,000, which exceeds $6,000,000. The test would be failed on the strength of a single valuation input. In practice the goodwill of the business, and the earnings and multiple behind it, can decide the test. See what goodwill is in a business valuation.
What the valuation needs to show
- The right date. Values just before the CGT event, not at the financial year end. When the CGT event happened depends on the kind of event, so confirm the time with the tax adviser before the valuation date is fixed.
- Every counted entity. A list of the taxpayer, each connected entity and each affiliate, with the reason each is or is not counted.
- Market values, with method and evidence. Particularly for goodwill and real property. The ATO's guide gives an example of a company that valued its properties itself, was found on review to have understated them, failed the test and was penalised.
- Transaction evidence. Where the CGT event is a sale of the business or shares to an unrelated buyer at arm's length, the price agreed is strong evidence of market value, and a total value for the entity that sits well below it will need explaining. A price agreed with a related party is not reliable evidence; see Example 3 in the ATO's market valuation guide.
- Liabilities and provisions classified. Each balance sheet item marked as a related liability, a provision that section 152-20(1)(b) allows, or an amount that is not a liability for the test.
- Exclusions explained. Each disregarded asset, the provision relied on and, for a main residence used partly to produce income, the apportionment.
- No double counting. Interests in connected entities left out, but the liabilities related to them kept in.
Limitations
- This page explains the maximum net asset value test only. Eligibility for the concessions depends on all of the basic conditions in section 152-10 and the further conditions for each concession, which are not covered here.
- Whether entities are connected or affiliated is a question of fact and law for the tax adviser. The worked example simply assumes the answers.
- Look-through earnout rights have special rules in section 152-20(5) to (7) that are not covered by the example.
- This page describes the law in the compilation of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 current at 1 October 2026. It is general information and is not tax advice.
Next steps
- Map the taxpayer's connected entities and affiliates with the tax adviser before ordering any valuation.
- Identify the time just before the CGT event and gather balance sheets for each counted entity as close to it as possible.
- Obtain market values for goodwill and property, with the method and evidence documented.
- Classify every liability and provision against section 152-20(1), and use the enterprise to equity value calculator to check the company-level figures.
Questions
Is the test applied at the end of the financial year?
No. Section 152-15 applies the test just before the CGT event. Asset values and liabilities are measured at that time, which may be months away from the last balance sheet.
Is goodwill counted even though it is not on the balance sheet?
Yes, if it is a CGT asset of the entity. The test uses market values, not book values, so goodwill that was never recorded in the accounts still has to be valued.
Are the shares in my client's own company counted?
Shares, units or other interests (except debt) in an entity connected with the entity being tested or with its affiliate are disregarded, because that entity's own assets are counted directly. Any liability related to those shares, such as a loan used to buy them, is still included.
Does the $6 million limit change each year?
The Act sets the limit as a fixed $6,000,000 in section 152-15, in the compilation current at 1 October 2026, so it does not change each year unless the Act is amended.
Sources
- Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Compilation No. 268, 1 October 2026), Volume 4, Federal Register of Legislation. s152-10(1)(c) the test as one alternative basic condition; s152-15 the $6,000,000 test just before the CGT event; s152-20 net value of CGT assets, deductible provisions and disregarded assets; s152-47 spouses and children as affiliates for passively held assets; s152-78 trustee nomination of controllers of a discretionary trust.
- Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Compilation No. 268, 1 October 2026), Volume 7, Federal Register of Legislation. s328-125 meaning of connected with an entity (control generally at 40% or more); s328-130 meaning of affiliate.
- Maximum net asset value test, Australian Taxation Office. Further reading: the ATO's web page on the maximum net asset value test.
- Market valuation for tax purposes, Australian Taxation Office (Legal database). Market value in its ordinary meaning; the taxpayer bears the onus for a defensible valuation; example of a company that failed the test after its self-prepared property values were found to be understated.
Cite or reuse this page
Valuo Insights team (2026). The maximum net asset value test: what the valuation needs to show. Valuo. https://valuo.com.au/insights/maximum-net-asset-value-test-valuation/ (updated 14 November 2026).
Quote short passages with attribution and a link to this page. Charts and tables created by Valuo may be republished unchanged with the credit "Source: Valuo (valuo.com.au)" and a link. Third-party sources keep their own terms. See the reuse terms.
General educational information, not financial, tax or legal advice. Worked examples are hypothetical and do not value a real business. A valuation depends on its purpose, the evidence and the agreed scope.
